| Site Features |
| |
| |
 |
In-depth
research on US public companies' takeover defense strategies |
 |
Research
covering
Charter and bylaw provisions
Poison pill provisions
State takeover statutes |
 |
Searching
on over 200 takeover defense data points |
 |
Research covering proxy fights, proxy proposals, and activism including profiles of activist hedge funds |
 |
Surveillance tools to monitor activist investors - be alerted when an activist takes an ownership stake, increases its position or commences a new campaign |
 |
Predefined
and custom reports |
 |
Report formats
in
Excel, HTML, PDF, Word & XML |
 |
Links to
source SEC filings |
 |
Client and project tracking |
| |
| |
|
|
|
Research Spotlight - View Archive
|
|
The week prior to Bank of America Corporation's special meeting to vote on a management proposal that will allow for a combined Chairman and CEO provides an interesting opportunity to examine recent voting trends related to this topic and this corporate governance issue in general.
The proposal in question seeks to ratify a bylaw amendment adopted by the company's Board of Directors in October 2014 that permits the Board to determine its leadership structure, including appointing an independent Chairman or allowing the same individual to hold both the Chairman and CEO roles. The bylaw amendment removed a provision that was adopted in 2009 requiring that the Chairman be independent from the corporation. This provision had to be removed in order to grant CEO Brian T. Moynihan the additional role of Chairman in 2014. It was originally adopted in response to the passing of a binding shareholder proposal at the company's 2009 annual meeting. The fact that the board unilaterally reversed a provision adopted directly by shareholders has made this a more contentious vote than a typical corporate governance issue would be. What's more, the timing of the vote, which will take place outside the busy proxy season allowing for more attention and analysis, has made this the highest profile vote on the issue since the 2013 vote at JPMorgan Chase & Co.
|
| Shareholder proposals seeking an independent chairman is a perennial top corporate governance issue and has been trending up |
 |
| But these proposals rarely actually pass |
|
|
|
| More... |
|
|
|